There’s tightening and there’s quantitative tightening
Pre-2008 financial crisis quantitative easing (QE) wasn’t a particularly familiar tool, nor was it particularly common knowledge outside the realm of central banking. However, when it became clear in the midst of the Great Recession that ever lower interest rates just weren’t going to cut it, quantitative easing was rapidly ushered in as a suddenly normal policy tool. Most developed nations have continued to sustain an element of QE post financial crisis with it becoming a seemingly permanent monetary fixture. The interpretation of just what QE means has been different also.
Often referred to as the printing of money, QE seeks to inject liquidity and money into the financial system by a central bank purchasing debt thereby freeing up the money to the debt issuing entity. This serves the role of preserving the functioning of capital markets during periods of financial duress whilst also providing stimulus, with the central bank dictating the pace of the injection. Exactly what debt is purchased and from whom has been the source of national variation. The Eurozone has had to flirt and dodge its own rules set out in its founding treatises and will therefore only buy debt on the secondary market (I.e post-first issuance) creating a potential weak spot in policy. The Federal Reserve in the US by contrast has been far more zealous with corporate as well as public debt on the table for purchase.
In the world we now live in, characterised by soaring inflation, markets have made a resounding pledge to pursue monetary tightening. The focus for markets and currencies has so far been on the headline decision taken with respective headline interest rates and how the market is pricing those same rates across the forward curve. As inflation continues to persist central banks are also now addressing their balance sheet and how they will unwind the accumulation of debt on their books as a result of nearly two decades of QE. So-called quantitative tightening presents its own risks and apart from very isolated and short-lived cases, is relatively untested.
Each nation as a result of its QE program and current inflation outlook has a different task to face up to with respect to quantitative tightening. The Fed will now finally begin unwinding the public (Treasury) debt that it holds as it tries to dispose of its $9T balance sheet. It has announced plans to boost the monthly caps for Treasuries and Mortgage-backed securities it holds allowing a combined near-$100bn windup per month. How the money market digests this and other attempts to winddown central banks’ balance sheets will be increasingly critical to foreign exchange flows.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter

Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
A short lived short squeeze? Sterling is undoubtedly benefitting from a short squeeze. Traders on net had increased positions that benefit from Sterling’s demise leading into the budget. Depending upon the participant’s persuasion, that could have meant gaining an outright short exposure to the currency or, in a more mild form, trimming any or all […]
But does it mean anything for FX? The story of the week also therefore makes it the story of the year so far. The United States’ capture of Venezuelan President Maduro is the hot topic, but does it hold any material impact to markets? Well, there was certainly some significant moves in FX during yesterday’s […]
Sterling slides Sterling took a leg lower ahead of the European open yesterday. Despite some tentative signs of recovery, GBP was still unable to claw back losses incurred during yesterday’s session. Before we cover the cause and implications of yesterday’s stumble amongst GBP crosses, let’s look at why the Pound was set up for a […]