Last Thursday, the European Central Bank undertook and presented what is, and what will be, arguably their most important monetary policy decision of this year. In keeping with the dominant theme from the Governor who hasn’t raised rates since he took office in 2014, the monetary policy decision was vague, dovish and resulted in an unsettling sell off in the Euro and underlying debt/derivatives.
The decision was so widely anticipated largely due to a churning of the rumour mill following disturbingly hawkish comments from the ECB’s chief economist, Peter Praet. The bank’s chief eyes and ears suggested the ECB’s feverish debt accumulation, that was initiated to insulate the Eurozone economy during and after the European Sovereign Debt crisis, is now redundant and ought to be pulled back indefinitely.
Given that net asset purchases still run wild at an accumulation rate of 30bn Euros worth of corporate and sovereign debt each month, the comments were probably overdue. However, in the context of an assumedly perpetually dovish European Central Bank, the rumour mill did generate a considerable bid and buying episode behind the Euro.
Draghi’s subsequent decision did, as foreboded by the chief economist, discuss both the near turn outlook (pace) for the tapering of quantitative easing and its eventual extermination. However, in true arch-Dove fashion, it was achieved in the slowest, most elongated and laborious way possible by the Euro Area monetary authority.
Dragging his feet, the bank’s governor announced that net asset purchases would fall to 15 billion euros per month whilst keeping the reinvestment of matured bonds and debt at 100%. Moreover, given that the ECB has deified the concept of sequencing (whereby interest rates cannot move before the QE program is culled), Draghi pushed back expectations for the first-rate hike until nearly the end of 2019. In a ‘deliberately vague’ wording, the ECB’s top dog and 8th most powerful man on the planet (Forbes) put his name behind stagnant interest rates, at least through the Summer of 2019.
The QE program will end up being just shy of a 2.4 trillion Euro experiment to save the Eurozone. And, my gosh, it’s success, despite resting upon dubious academic and industrial grounds, can hardly be knocked! However, the program does, and will continue, to flood the market with excess above-equilibrium demand for European public and corporate debt instruments that would otherwise not exist. As such, it puts immense downward pressure upon debt yields (making the raising of capital for treasuries and corporates considerably cheaper) but also immense downward pressure on the single currency, the Euro.
Draghi’s taper was delivered, but only in the most reluctant and cautious way possible. Given that markets had expected a little more in the face of Praet’s comments and a long consideration of the Eurozone economy, the Euro tumbled by over 1.5% against the Dollar. The Euro therefore continues its fall against its international counterparts, however, as it simultaneously (de facto) becomes cheaper and its underlying assets more competitive, so too does inflationary pressure and the hope of, finally, a hike from the powerful man, who won’t use his powers!
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
Fifty Up Exactly 50 years ago today I set out on my career in the City of London. Many of the men whom I worked with wore bowler hats and smoked pipes. Discount House men wore morning dress and top hats. Everyone wore two or three piece suits and black shoes. If you wore brown […]
Bank of England In an interview with the Guardian newspaper, Governor Bailey made it clear that Central Banks could afford to cut interest rates more sharply. Markets correctly interpreted that statement as him preparing the way for cuts at pretty much every Bank of England MPC meeting for the next 6 months until they reach […]
China A snapshot of China today gives more than a strong indication of the likely effect on the rest of the world’s economies. In August, China had record breaking temperatures – the highest for 60 years which was further exacerbated by thunderstorms which affected agriculture sending vegetable prices 22% higher than 1 year before. Despite […]