We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
Doomsday:
An unnecessarily intelligent man named Francis Fukuyama, in 1989, wrote an essay entitled “The End of History?”. In this essay, written in the twilight of the cold war, the American Political Scientist posited the hypothesis that perhaps, with democracy sweeping across the globe, history would be over. Striking a strong resemblance to the somewhat questionable theoretical argument of the democratic peace thesis – the empirically dubious series of propositions that concludes no two democratic states have ever gone to war against each other – Fukuyama questioned why his-story would continue; what would we have to talk about?! Well Fukuyama, at least thus far, is wrong. Historians to this day still debate the formulation and failures of the League of Nations: its exclusions; its objectors; its failures. They argue perhaps its failures at least allowed a space for Nazi Germany to grow and the second world war to eventually materialise. What Fukuyama failed to realise is that institutions are history, history is not war and the democratic and liberal paradigm that we now live in is just a worthy of his story than any war has ever been. The potential consequences of Britain exit upon the European Union could be far reaching and it’s not patriotically egotistical to suggest that, much as the United States’ non-membership of the League of Nations hindered institutional success altering the course of history, Britain’s non-membership of the Union could too change the lives of billions alive now and to be born. Back to forex: I implore you; don’t be on the wrong side of history. Something phenomenal, for better or for worse, is about to happen with consequences and opportunities for hidden value that occur perhaps once in a lifetime. The rumours that have moved markets dramatically this week, pinning the Pound as high as 1.1450 against the Euro and 1.3247 versus the Dollar have all suggested an informal deal may be on the table as early as next Monday. Confirmed by Barnier to the European Commission yesterday, this is entirely possible and for now we wait to see what it looks like.
Since Market Open:
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
Holding on With less than a 10% probability of a cut priced into the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) latest monetary policy decision, it is unsurprising markets open today to news of a hold. The RBA adopted a lower peak rate of benchmark interest than the likes of the UK and USA with lower inflationary […]
Now that’s what I call Tariffs The title of this briefing is an homage to that (n)ever-popular publication of CDs (formerly vinyl) that seemed to be everywhere when I was growing up. Containing the ‘best’ hits of a particular year, you never seemed to be far from a ‘now that’s what I call’ CD (or […]
What is the Mar-a-Lago Accord, and should markets care? At heart, the Mar-a-Lago Accord is a proposal for President Trump to weaken the US Dollar. As we know, Trump’s typical deregulatory and risk-inducing persuasion would, all other things equal, increase demand for the US Dollar. As far as the relationship between perceived risk and the […]