A trade deal is done between the US and China: call the IMF to tell them to change global growth forecasts; let emerging market currencies rally at the expense of overvalued safe-havens! Sadly not.
Whilst Trump didn’t give markets any last minute surprises by refusing to sign the document or kicking off that it was Vice Premier Liu He and not his counterpart General Secretary Xi that sighed the deal, the quiet in markets since its signing last night shows us the importance of the deal – low! There are two huge insufficiencies in the deal.
Firstly, the substance of the deal: at the core of the trade dispute and therefore phase 1 trade deal is agriculture. It is of particular importance to Trump because much of his voting base have already felt the impact of punitive tariffs on Chinese imports of such goods. The deal therefore pledges China to spend $32bn over the next two years on agricultural goods. That’s all well and good until we realise that on average last decade during the Obama years China spent $22bn annually on such goods anyway! Therefore the deal guarantees less trade than the free market had already facilitated. From this element and others, the conclusion is that the deal is so weak that it cannot be thought of as a resolution in any more concrete terms than a symbolic gesture.
Problem two: there’s no mechanism. The deal does not dictate how the underwhelming promises will be delivered leaving considerable doubt over whether the pledges made will translate into constructive trade. The lack of methodology also means we don’t even know whether China will lift extant tariffs on its importation of US exports including those on energy and soybeans (the largest historical component of US agricultural export to China). This exclusion cannot be considered an oversight, it must have been a deliberate redaction and likely one that is keeping tensions elevated between the two nations behind closed doors. With cloud surrounding the already insufficient deal, markets have not found the deal to be something to celebrate yet.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
Related Insights
Morning Brief – Too soon to call USD lower
Charles Porter
Thu 25 Apr 2024
Too soon to call USD lower Those following the US Dollar’s performance in the markets would have noted a recent downturn accelerating as this week has progressed. There have been two factors driving this sell-off but it is far from certain that either may endure long enough to push the Dollar index back to its […]
Morning Brief – Milan, Italy
Humphrey Percy
Wed 24 Apr 2024
Milan, Italy The City of Milan has a late night noise problem and so it has acted unilaterally to resolve it-Italian style. A ban on the sale of take away food including ice cream and pizza after midnight is being imposed to protect the “peace and health of residents.” Here in the UK late night […]
Morning Brief – Coal tinted spectacles
Charles Porter
Tue 23 Apr 2024
Coal tinted spectacles If you had to boil down the global economy into one category from the options of bad/fair/good, what would you choose? We all experience the economy vastly differently down to an infinite number of variables. But by and large the current phase we are in, characterised by strong global growth rates, record […]
