Grab an economics textbook and I bet it’ll tell you that a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of nil or negative economic growth. It’s such an old and entrenched definition that to be honest I’m not even sure who came up with it in the first place. The one thing that is for certain in at least any academic debate about recession and growth is that the definition is just a tad stupid. Quite literally: it considers one variable over a very short period of time and makes what has become rather a dramatic statement that the observed economy is in a recession. Despite those almost universal reservations about the definition, no one has apparently seemed interested in finding a new one. Instead, the two-quarter definition is often labelled a technical rather than real recession.
This debate today is far more than academic, however. It has captured attention in the US as a battle seems to be being played out between US officials and the public over whether the economy is in a recession. Due to the superficial definition of the term, recession is largely discounted to have any meaning as a word in many circumstances. However, lawmakers in the US are very quick to identify the stigma that is associated with this word following the so-called Great Recession that followed the financial crisis of 2007/8. The word itself can change consumer and investment habits more often than not to make the economic situation worse, not better.
So, whilst many Republican lawmakers brandish the phrase recessionary Biden, officials amongst the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department are trying to avoid, even refute the existence of, the classification of recession. Due to the damage the word can create in consumer and investment spending patterns, the US has a neat solution not seen in many other places in the world: its own body that defines without predetermined conditions whether the US economy is in recession or not. Rather helpfully, it often takes a very long time in its classifications, lessening the market impact of a recession verdict with the passing of time.
The National Bureau of Economic Research officially decides whether the US economy is in recession. The arguments from Jay Powell and Janet Yellen against the economy being in recession include the strength of the labour market and the base effects created by the rebound from the pandemic. As we wrote last week, US growth has as it stands observed two consecutive quarters of negative economy growth. This debate creates an increased sensitivity and attention towards data, not least the non-farm payrolls due to be released later this week.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
Related Insights
Morning Brief – False Illusions
Charles Porter
Fri 6 Jan 2023
alse Illusions On Friday last week markets had got very exuberant over comments made by the Federal Reserve Chair the day prior. As a result of the interpretation of those comments, the US Dollar had dropped several cents to trade at its recent lows. There was a narrative that was being pieced together and justified […]
Morning Brief – Calling the bluff
Charles Porter
Thu 15 Dec 2022
Calling the bluff As expected, the Federal Reserve raised interest rates in the United States yesterday evening by a further 50 basis points. As a result of this policy adjustment, immediate target policy levels now stand at 4.25-4.5%. As also expected, the Fed pushed back fairly hard on the idea that it is ready to […]
Morning Brief – Pencil to pen
Charles Porter
Tue 13 Dec 2022
Pencil to pen As with any year ahead, 2023 has been fervently speculated over by market participants. Whilst forecasts for the forthcoming year take great priority every year, 2023 has perhaps the most divergent set of forecasts between analysts and institutions on recent record. Across asset classes and between institutions the core themes expected to […]
