The best way to solve a problem in politics, almost without exception, is to present the simplest form of the idea possible to maximise the expectation of success that each voter carries. What’s not a particularly grand idea in most scenarios, and certainly not when attempting to do something quickly, is to redefine millennia-old suppositions. Queue Johnson…
We know that it’s unacceptable to the United Kingdom and the European Union for there to exist a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. But it looks like Boris is sailing pretty close to the wind when interpreting this negotiating redline set out years ago. As the devolved head of Brexit negotiations for the European Union, Michel Barnier will not be able to accept anything in violation of the mandate offered to him by the European Council. So it will come down to the interpretation of Boris’ solution that is internalised in Brussels.
What is a border to you? A line in the sand; a cultural divide; a linguistic divide; a military line; all of the above or something different entirely? Whatever your ideological interpretation, what does it look like? Physically imposing; seemingly invisible; 1 inch thick or 100 miles deep? The principle of a borderline is what Johnson is, consciously or not, bringing into the debate. As reported by the Irish broadcaster RTE last night, the Prime Minister is looking for goods checks away from the legal border between the UK and Ireland thereby avoiding a ‘hard’ border that would violate several Parliamentary agreements. However, that same broadcaster, seemingly correct in their observations that Boris is ready to present his deal to Parliament and the EU, also reported that Boris’ vision for the checks are stations scattered about 10 miles from the geographical divide.
The danger then is of creating a kind of no-man’s land, a rhetorical hive of unlawful customs in a strip between the check-line and the legal border. Moving the border 10 miles down the road is not a way to solve the border problem and the EU will be staunchly opposed to this. Hopefully, murmurs coming from Westminster in the early hours of this morning are correct – these rumours suggest the PM is thinking of introducing point of delivery customs checks instead. The benefits and drawbacks of taking no-deal off the table seem balanced today: it unfortunately takes no-deal off the table for EU negotiations but it does prevent the so-called Tory Spartans from believing they can do better this time around. More than three years of Brexit negotiations are coming to a peak this week as the plans are unveiled and Johnson is in the driving seat: buckle up! The Pound has opened approximately in line with its Friday close reflecting investors’ reservations about Johnson’s supposed plan. Expect choppy trading this week and serious upside momentum upon any indications that the EU is amenable to the hide-and-seek border.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
Germany and the EU The Germany Supply Chain Act came into force in 2023 as a result of Germans wanting to do something good for employees in other countries in particular with respect to human rights and environmental issues. So far so good. But a combination of cost and bureaucracy overlaid with the difficulty of […]
US Dollar With the US Election just over 6 months away it is time to think about the implications for USD with a new President. In case you have missed it Trump plans In the event he wins to devalue USD to boost US exports as part of his MAGA philosophy. As we know ex […]
Japanese Yen With JPY at a new 34 year low versus EUR, the market is set for an ambush by the Bank of Japan if it acts today at the end of their Policy Meeting to support the Yen. The reason that the market is susceptible is because it has convinced itself that the BoJ […]