The best way to solve a problem in politics, almost without exception, is to present the simplest form of the idea possible to maximise the expectation of success that each voter carries. What’s not a particularly grand idea in most scenarios, and certainly not when attempting to do something quickly, is to redefine millennia-old suppositions. Queue Johnson…
We know that it’s unacceptable to the United Kingdom and the European Union for there to exist a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. But it looks like Boris is sailing pretty close to the wind when interpreting this negotiating redline set out years ago. As the devolved head of Brexit negotiations for the European Union, Michel Barnier will not be able to accept anything in violation of the mandate offered to him by the European Council. So it will come down to the interpretation of Boris’ solution that is internalised in Brussels.
What is a border to you? A line in the sand; a cultural divide; a linguistic divide; a military line; all of the above or something different entirely? Whatever your ideological interpretation, what does it look like? Physically imposing; seemingly invisible; 1 inch thick or 100 miles deep? The principle of a borderline is what Johnson is, consciously or not, bringing into the debate. As reported by the Irish broadcaster RTE last night, the Prime Minister is looking for goods checks away from the legal border between the UK and Ireland thereby avoiding a ‘hard’ border that would violate several Parliamentary agreements. However, that same broadcaster, seemingly correct in their observations that Boris is ready to present his deal to Parliament and the EU, also reported that Boris’ vision for the checks are stations scattered about 10 miles from the geographical divide.
The danger then is of creating a kind of no-man’s land, a rhetorical hive of unlawful customs in a strip between the check-line and the legal border. Moving the border 10 miles down the road is not a way to solve the border problem and the EU will be staunchly opposed to this. Hopefully, murmurs coming from Westminster in the early hours of this morning are correct – these rumours suggest the PM is thinking of introducing point of delivery customs checks instead. The benefits and drawbacks of taking no-deal off the table seem balanced today: it unfortunately takes no-deal off the table for EU negotiations but it does prevent the so-called Tory Spartans from believing they can do better this time around. More than three years of Brexit negotiations are coming to a peak this week as the plans are unveiled and Johnson is in the driving seat: buckle up! The Pound has opened approximately in line with its Friday close reflecting investors’ reservations about Johnson’s supposed plan. Expect choppy trading this week and serious upside momentum upon any indications that the EU is amenable to the hide-and-seek border.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
US Trade War Tariffs With all markets awaiting what emanates from POTUS later today, Trump has certainly achieved one aim: getting the world’s collective attention. Increasingly desperate TV pundits have spent the past hours dragging past Trade Negotiators into the studio in an effort to get them to predict what the tariffs will look like. […]
De-Dollarization A shift away from the US Dollar with Central Bank Reserves denominated in US Dollars moving down from a high of just over 70% down to 60% in the past 20 years is note worthy but the speed of that decline makes it less striking. However there are 3 factors that are changing the […]
Pairs Trading Back in the days when I worked in Bermuda for a hedge fund, we were always seeking stocks that were overvalued and other stocks that were undervalued having analysed both sets of historical price behaviours. Normally those stocks were in the same industry but not necessarily in the same geographic region. In the […]