Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter:
Hawkish monetary policy rhetoric has enveloped financial markets, and particularly currency markets, over the past couple of weeks. High volatility has prevailed, even within the most developed currencies. The Bank of Canada was the exclusive major developed economy to have ‘walked the walk’, and raise interest rates earlier this month. This article analyses Bank of Canada Governor Stephen Poloz’s St John’s Board of Trade speech today and its impact upon the Canadian Dollar.
Canada was arguably not the most likely candidate for a rate hike decision during their September meeting. The main reasoning behind this belief is the low rate of inflation within the Canadian economy preceding the date of the decision. Moreover, low inflation is thought to be generated from the relative price decrease in imported goods.
The price of imported goods has fallen because the strength of the Canadian dollar has increased sharply, by over 12% against the US Dollar, since May through to early September this year. The US economy is Canada’s main trading partner, both in terms of exports and imports, dominating both sides of the currency account balance. Therefore, the price of Canadian exports from the perspective of the US Dollar has risen dramatically, putting downward pressure on the demand for Canadian good outside of its borders. This will spill over into aggregate demand and ultimately economic performance and growth.
A hawkish monetary policy decision, one in this case to raise and tighten interest rates, will cause an inflow of money into the domestic currency. Money enters the economy due to the higher rate of return and increased reward for saving. This effect causes a simultaneous appreciation of the Canadian Dollar because currency pairs will clear at higher rate according to the increased demand for money. Therefore, an interest rate hike would appear to be the Canadian economy shooting itself in the foot!
Indeed, at the time, perhaps the only macroeconomic indicator in favour of a rate hike was the economic growth performance, as measured by Gross Domestic Product. However, economic growth does not need to be curtailed through monetary policy if it does not manifest as inflationary pressure, or unsustainable growth. If economic growth is either organically insulated from macroeconomic (or microeconomic-bubble) spill overs, it may be allowed to continue, unconstrained. Therefore, given the non-inflationary rapid and sustainable growth within Canada, the decision to harm the exchange rate for exporters, amidst lower general inflation, is surprising.
Having contextualised the Canadian macroeconomy, Part Two of this article analyses the fall in the Canadian Dollar that we witnessed whilst Poloz spoke.
Holding on With less than a 10% probability of a cut priced into the Reserve Bank of Australia’s (RBA) latest monetary policy decision, it is unsurprising markets open today to news of a hold. The RBA adopted a lower peak rate of benchmark interest than the likes of the UK and USA with lower inflationary […]
What is the Mar-a-Lago Accord, and should markets care? At heart, the Mar-a-Lago Accord is a proposal for President Trump to weaken the US Dollar. As we know, Trump’s typical deregulatory and risk-inducing persuasion would, all other things equal, increase demand for the US Dollar. As far as the relationship between perceived risk and the […]
Pointless Being the Point Yesterday, UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves delivered her Spring Budget to the House of Commons. Since the government’s first budget last year, bond markets have not been kind to the Chancellor, taking its angst out in the form of higher yields. The selling (and increased issuance) of UK gilts has inevitably created […]