Grab an economics textbook and I bet it’ll tell you that a recession is defined as two consecutive quarters of nil or negative economic growth. It’s such an old and entrenched definition that to be honest I’m not even sure who came up with it in the first place. The one thing that is for certain in at least any academic debate about recession and growth is that the definition is just a tad stupid. Quite literally: it considers one variable over a very short period of time and makes what has become rather a dramatic statement that the observed economy is in a recession. Despite those almost universal reservations about the definition, no one has apparently seemed interested in finding a new one. Instead, the two-quarter definition is often labelled a technical rather than real recession.
This debate today is far more than academic, however. It has captured attention in the US as a battle seems to be being played out between US officials and the public over whether the economy is in a recession. Due to the superficial definition of the term, recession is largely discounted to have any meaning as a word in many circumstances. However, lawmakers in the US are very quick to identify the stigma that is associated with this word following the so-called Great Recession that followed the financial crisis of 2007/8. The word itself can change consumer and investment habits more often than not to make the economic situation worse, not better.
So, whilst many Republican lawmakers brandish the phrase recessionary Biden, officials amongst the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department are trying to avoid, even refute the existence of, the classification of recession. Due to the damage the word can create in consumer and investment spending patterns, the US has a neat solution not seen in many other places in the world: its own body that defines without predetermined conditions whether the US economy is in recession or not. Rather helpfully, it often takes a very long time in its classifications, lessening the market impact of a recession verdict with the passing of time.
The National Bureau of Economic Research officially decides whether the US economy is in recession. The arguments from Jay Powell and Janet Yellen against the economy being in recession include the strength of the labour market and the base effects created by the rebound from the pandemic. As we wrote last week, US growth has as it stands observed two consecutive quarters of negative economy growth. This debate creates an increased sensitivity and attention towards data, not least the non-farm payrolls due to be released later this week.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter

Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
A belated jobs surprise Entering last week, the markets had expected January’s non-farm payrolls to be published on Friday. After disruptions to the frequency and quality of this statistic, published by the Bureau for Labor Statistics, yesterday’s data point had become all the more important. As last week progressed, it became apparent that the market […]
Quick to Retreat A receding US Dollar once again yesterday was able to lift the outlook for FX. One significant outlier to that remained the Pound Sterling which, whilst still able to outperform an ailing Dollar, itself sunk lower. The main cause cited behind the underwhelming performance of GBP has been rising political risk. This […]
A Dollar Vacuum If you’ve ever heard the phrase, ‘a rising tide lifts all boats’, you already know everything you need about today’s FX market. That is provided of course you’re not trying to analyse the rising tide itself, in this case our US Dollar. The Dollar is the counter currency to most key pairs […]