We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.
The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ...
Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.
Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.
There are two critical moments in any public body’s response to an economic shock. The first is the initial reaction – how will governing institutions respond initially to reassure the markets and public alike to preserve as much normality as possible. Whilst the sustenance provided by these institutions throughout the course of an economic shock is important, it is of more marginal significance. The second critical moment arrives once the economic threat is receding or even passed, how do you remove support without spooking the market. If the latter of these objectives is not successfully managed it can have the impact of plunging the market into a renewed state of turmoil. The successful withdrawal of stimulus is as critical to financial stability and preserving economic output as the provision of initial support to an ailing market.
Often compared to threading a needle, it is now the prerogative of governments and central banks to identify how they will reel in and eventually withdraw excessive support entirely to allow public finances and balance sheets to consolidate. Often this is an impossible task to withdraw support mechanisms from a market that wants to cling onto its toys like a stubborn toddler. Accordingly, the so-called ‘taper tantrum’ refers to the scenario in which a central bank in particular tapers off monetary support and the market slashes valuations of financial assets in response to the dwindling support. Last week, however, provided something even more concerning – a no-taper tantrum.
Messages from Jay Powell’s Federal Reserve, Andrew Bailey’s Bank of England and Christine Lagarde’s ECB have flooded in and continue to proclaim of downside economic risks and the need to sustain crisis-era monetary policy for longer to allow a smooth exit from the pandemic. This comes against a backdrop of analysts’ forecasts and public sentiment that the economy should recover well later this year following the lifting of lockdown restrictions across the planet as the vaccination rollout reaches critical mass. Concerningly, there is no sign of tapering from central banks and even fiscal bodies remain on the front foot evidenced by Sunak’s anticipated speech tomorrow and Biden’s $1.9tn stimulus programme. This commitment to continued economic and monetary support comes despite the obvious signs of a recovering economy, and even in this environment, the market still convinced itself withdrawal of monetary support was coming. With no taper in sight the US treasury market began selling government debt, decreasing its price and raising the yield on longer dated bonds on Thursday night.
All of these moves were in anticipation of the rising risk of inflation and the corresponding need to raise rates in the future. Inflation in small quantities is seen as the grease on the wheels of the global economy and is why almost every central bank on the planet has a core commitment to maintain price stability but at a positive rate of inflation. However, too much of a good thing and particularly when coming too quickly and unannounced is damaging and underlies the sharp sell off in US treasuries and the spill over into global fixed income markets that took place last week. The move spooked markets that had been enjoying the earlier half of the week amidst a backdrop of warming risk sentiment. The Swiss Franc and Japanese Yen, two defensive safehaven currencies, outperformed as well as the US Dollar as risk rose.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter
Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
UK Borrowing Another one for the pub quiz in case it comes up: UK government borrowing stands at £2.8 trillion or £2800 billion. While you digest that number over the chicken in the basket if indeed you are already in the pub, it will have increased by the time you get to the end of this […]
USD 2 Trillion Trade Deals That is the total trade deal bag that POTUS Trump is credited admittedly by himself with snagging in his whirlwind Gulf trip this week. Many are puzzled and a few have attempted to tot up the value of the Saudi, UAE and Qatari deals, but no-one has succeeded in getting […]
POTUS in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia As one of POTUS’ travelling companions on this week’s visit, Larry Fink of Blackrock represents everything that a US President might want to burnish his credentials in the desert kingdom: head of the largest asset manager on the planet, hugely influential and totally credible. Just a shame that he […]