Russian President Vladimir Putin has been taking a tough line on the Dollar. He has been claiming that western foreign policy, sharped in no small part by the United States, is to blame for the rising commodity and Dollar prices globally. Even citing recent IMF figures for the Dollarisation of global foreign exchange reserves, Putin appeared to take aim at the role of the Dollar as the kingpin of global reserves. Unsurprisingly given the European Union’s role in the sanctions levied on Russia following the invasion of Ukraine, the President focussed on the role of the Euro in those reserves too.
Putin’s argument was that in a post-pandemic post-invasion world, it was physical goods that are holding a value, not money. His rather archaic and feudal view of the global economic would see governments stockpile commodities, hard and soft hoarding everything from food to oil rather than money. Of course, this would serve the President’s own ends as a significant benefactor of global commodity export and with the Ruble as an incredibly small player in the global reserve market. The announcement was in no small part also motivated by the US’s confiscation of Russia’s reserves.
The discussion regarding the composition of foreign exchange reserves is often a debate that includes China at the centre of it. China is one of the world’s largest holders of US treasuries and US Dollars in its national reserves by volume. Frequently over recent decades it has been public about its dissatisfaction with the reliance upon US Dollars in global reserves. It was one of the catalysts behind the emerging trend to hold Euros in more significant volumes within reserves.
China’s Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin will have something to talk about then when they meet for the first time following the invasion of Ukraine. Pressure has been applied to China as well as Russia from US foreign policy as of late. The two will meet later this month at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation’s summit in Uzbekistan in one weeks’ time. This geopolitical alliance is one that markets will continue to keep an eye on not least just for the potential coordinated rhetoric/action on Dollar reserves but for its significance to global supply chains also.
Discussion and Analysis by Charles Porter

Click Here to Subscribe to the SGM-FX Newsletter
On course for Warsh? The latest Federal Reserve decision concluded last night. Mirroring the prior decision, the FOMC voted to keep policy rates on hold within a band of 3.5-3.75%. Ordinarily, yesterday’s meeting could have been a lesser-event. After all, with the arrival of Chair Jay Powell’s successor on May 15th, this could have been […]
Questioning Truth Adopting the same handle as his now rather redundant X account, @realDonaldTrump shocked markets yesterday using his own social media platform, Truth Social. During Trump 1.0, the legitimacy of a President using an unofficial X, then Twitter, account was questioned. Now under Trump 2.0, it’s seldom questioned when he is the majority shareholder […]
Sticky forecasts? One theme from the early days of this conflict in the Middle East was complacent pricing. Markets still saw the knee-jerk reaction of a flight to safety and a rotation away from risk, but it was on a small scale. Markets didn’t crash per se, they slumped. Even energy markets, which have arguably […]